I’ve been toying lately with the idea of blogging. I’ve played with it in the past, but have not
sufficiently come up with a definition for what “blogging” actually is. Should I find a blogging “niche” so that I’m
readable, like crafting or cooking or ministry?
(And on that note, what happens if all the aforementioned skills are somewhat,
if not seriously, lacking?) What if I’m
not an interesting enough person? Is it
okay to be serious and pastoral in one post and quirky and irrelevant in another,
or does that seem completely inconsistent and annoying? What if no one cares to read anything I
say?
Long story short, I’ve been reading Bittersweet, by Shauna Niequist (who, perhaps not-so-ironically, is
also a blogger). Tonight I read this in
her book:
“We create because we were made to
create, having been made in the image of God, whose first role was Creator […]
Do the work, learn the skills, and make art, because of what the act of
creation will create in you” (pg 160, 163).
I know this is true with my husband, Matt. He plays piano, messes with graphic design,
loves to paint and draw and write. He
doesn’t do it for anyone else. He doesn’t
expect to be well-known or relevant.
Honestly, most of what he does doesn’t leave our living room. But the process is therapeutic. Pulling away from all the other pressures of
life (which can be insidious when you’re a married full-time student in a PhD
program) is not only relaxing, it’s restful—like
taking a walk or sitting with a book and a cup of coffee is for some of the
rest of us. He does it for him, because
his creative cups are filling up and overflowing.
So what if no one ever reads what I write. So what if I don't blog every day, or have anything particularly mind blowing to say every week. What if it's just about reflecting on the little moments, the stories, the wonderings, the highlights? If it brings a little light and life, maybe it's worth making time for. If it's part of my God-created self, maybe that can be enough.